Solar Energy And Its Social Consequences Essays - Energy Conversion

Sun based Energy And Its Social Consequences Essays - Energy Conversion Sun based Energy and Its Social Consequences To comprehend the social outcomes of sun based vitality, one must know about what sunlight based vitality is. Sun based vitality is a brilliant vitality delivered in the sun because of atomic combination responses. It is transmitted to the earth through space in quanta of vitality called photons, which cooperate with the earth?s air and surface. The quality of sun powered radiation at the external edge of the earth?s air when the earth is at its normal good ways from the sun is known as the sunlight based steady. The power of vitality really accessible at the earth?s surface is not exactly the sunlight based consistent as a result of the assimilation and dissipating of brilliant vitality as photons interface with the earth?s environment (Thorsen, 1997, Encarta). The sum and quality of the sun oriented vitality accessible anytime on the earth relies upon the day of the year, time of day, the scope of the assortment point, and the direction of the article utilized in assortment. The earth is wealthy in bountiful regular assets. In any case, the earth?s common assets are being devoured at a cosmic rate. It may involve time before those assets are drained and we are compelled to think about different other options. We can hold up until each asset has been devoured and return to living the manner in which humankind did a century prior, or we can keep on pushing ahead and investigate the potential outcomes of bridling the intensity of something that remaining parts consistent in our lives?the sun. Humankind has been utilizing the normal vitality of the sun for a very long time. Connections between the sun?s vitality, the seas, and the environment produce winds that have been utilized for a considerable length of time to turn windmills. Current uses of wind vitality, when connected to generators, produce power. Through photosynthesis, sun powered vitality adds to the development of vegetation masses that can be utilized as fuel, for example, liquor or methane. Sunlight based vitality is a spotless and safe wellspring of common vitality that ought to be considered as an elective vitality hotspot for what's to come. The sun isn't indigenous to any one nation. It is an asset that can be used all inclusive. People and nations might turn out to be increasingly independent in vitality assets (Alcorn, 1997, p. 212). A thought that has been proposed to create power for an enormous scope would include putting monster sun oriented modules in earth?s circle where vitality produced from daylight would be changed over to microwaves and radiated to recieving wires on earth to be changed over to electric force (Thorsen, 1997, Encarta). To create as much force a five atomic force plants, ten million pounds and a few square miles of sunlight based authorities would need to be gathered in circle and an earth based reception apparatus five miles in width would be required. This vision requires an extreme measure of cash. As far as anyone is concerned, there isn?t an administration on earth that is willing, hitherto, to store such a task. The possible future employments of sun powered vitality are gone up against with restriction. Up until now, the expense of building gadgets that would have the option to saddle a free vitality source is at the highest priority on the rundown. I understand there is a great deal of cash included, however I truly can?t think about any mechanical revelation that was allowed in any case. Each development has come to fruition through logical exploration, and examination requires cash. Some have communicated concern with respect to specific ventures changing their items to flexibly the new needs of society (Alcorn, 1997, p. 213). Because of new and expected prospects propels in innovation, the world will consistently be everlastingly evolving. A few ventures will at first ingest some financial and opportunity costs, yet it is the value they should pay for movement. Another open concern is Mother Nature. On the off chance that we experience an excessive number of overcast days straight; at t hat point we will require a reinforcement wellspring of vitality. Maybe it would be a smart thought to investigate the conceivable outcomes and store the examination for sun oriented vitality before we exhaust our reinforcement assets.

Advanced Critical Writing The WritePass Journal

Progressed Critical Writing Presentation Progressed Critical Writing ). Liquor is without a doubt a general medical problem and is engaged with a high number of street car crashes and hostile to social exercises, for example, ambush, just as being related with various interminable sicknesses including alcoholic liver ailment and a scope of tumors (Rehm et al., 2009; Schã ¼tze et al., 2011). Moreover, the financial expense can be decimating with liquor related injury costing the National Health Service (NHS) around  £2.7 billion every year, in view of 2006 to 2007 figures (NHS, 2011). Subsequently, the Government ought to in reality feel some duty to handle and decrease these figures assuming there is any chance of this happening. The creator contends that such a procedure as least unit valuing for liquor will be an encroachment on the British individuals, an infringement of the free market economy and will make moderate and dependable consumers pay for the â€Å"crimes of a few.† However, the creator later repudiates themselves saying that â€Å"boosting the expense [of alcohol] isn’t going to stop me drinking, it’s going to simply keep me separate from pocket.† Here, the creator has gone from the extraordinary and sensational to a practically deriding of the proposed arrangement. It becomes muddled whether the creator genuinely accepts that the arrangement would seriously influence the guiltless or whether it would essentially leave individuals shy of a couple of pounds toward the month's end. This sort of conflicting composing can likewise been seen somewhere else in the article. For instance, the essayist opens the article with a dinky and evil scene utilizing reminiscent words and expressions, for example, â€Å"swarming†, â€Å"staggering† and â€Å"teenagers slouched over a container of Frosty Jacks.† This utilization of language proposes that the writer is sickened and repulsed by gorge consumers and the open utilization of modest liquor on British roads. In any case, the writer rapidly proceeds to revile Government endeavors to handle the issue as a â€Å"crazy idea†, by and by conveying a blended message to the peruser. The creator additionally contends against the case that an expansion in costs for drinks with a high liquor substance will put off the kind of individuals who purchase such beverages absolutely to accomplish a condition of intoxication, to be specific people experiencing liquor addiction. The creator asks â€Å"isn’t it their decision to drink alcohol?† and recommends that it is inadmissible to hurt the normal individual monetarily by attempting to cost such people out of the liquor showcase. This an amazingly reductionist perspective, implying that the writer of the article is decreasing the situation of a drunkard to the consequence of just â€Å"their choice† instead of considering the plenty of reasons that can lead a person down the damaging street of liquor addiction, for example, vagrancy, obligation or misuse. Such a view-point is possibly harming as Spanagel (2009) has cautioned that a reductionist perspective on the reasons for liquor abuse can hold up traffic of a superior comprehension of the basic obsessive procedures engaged with such addictive conduct. The creator proceeds to guarantee that usage of a  £0.45 least unit cost for liquor is the aftereffect of the Government’s endeavor to attempt to cause income from individuals who to can manage the cost of a value rise however are simply burdened by it. This is an outrageous allegation and the creator has neglected to consider the proof that recommends something else. In particular that such an arrangement could positively affect general wellbeing and the economy.â Using a cost to-utilization model utilizing different information sources and dependent on 54 populace sub-bunches classed as hurtful, dangerous or moderate consumers, Purshouse et al. (2010) assessed that a  £0.45 least cost unit for liquor would lessen liquor utilization by 4.5% and dodge 1,970 liquor related deaths.â An ongoing deliberate audit found that a cost increment of liquor by around 10% would prompt a decrease in utilization of liquor by around 5% (Wagenaar, Tobler and Komro, 2010). Both of these examinations have given solid proof that a base unit valuing technique with liquor would be viable in decreasing perilous liquor utilization. Further fortifying the contention for least unit evaluating are questions that different endeavors to decrease liquor utilization will be a long way from effective. In an ongoing publication, McKee (2012) featured that the three principle â€Å"lines of attack† for handling risky drinking comprise of showcasing, evaluating and accessibility. Advertising and limitations on accessibility are hard to control, particularly because of the campaigning power that numerous organizations inside the liquor business have (McKee, 2012), and instruction based mediations have been demonstrated to be insufficient (Anderson, Chisholm and Fuhr, 2009) Therefore, evaluating seems, by all accounts, to be possibly the best and most effortlessly controlled component that the Government can use to handle dangerous drinking. In any case, notwithstanding the b eneficial outcomes that a base estimating approach has been anticipated to have, there were additionally various downsides. For instance, an expansion in type 2 diabetes in young ladies was anticipated because of lost the medical advantages of moderate liquor utilization and the greater part of the decreases in mischief would have been seen in ceaseless disarranges in the over 45s, restricting the beneficial outcome on the wellbeing and prosperity of more youthful individuals (Purshouse et al., 2010). Besides, the figures delivered by Purshouse et al. (2010) depended on a timeframe 10 years after arrangement usage, proposing that the advantage of a base evaluating approach could be bound to happen. These disadvantages could be believed to help the author’s guarantee that the Government would utilize a base valuing technique principally to build their pay, seeing just as usage of the strategy would be restricted in its quick and generally speaking useful impacts on general wel lbeing. Moreover, options in contrast to least estimating, for example, expanding charge on liquor, have likewise been found to diminish levels of liquor utilization (Elder et al., 2010). Be that as it may, the presence of conceivably similarly as successful systems for handling unsafe drinking doesn't consequently propose a connivance by the Government to harvest more income through a base valuing methodology. The writer of the article can't help contradicting the case that liquor fills wrongdoing and with the figure that inebriated individuals are engaged with causing around 5,000 avoidable violations consistently. Notwithstanding, it is all around archived that liquor is productively associated with wrongdoing. From 1998 to 1999, 70% of violations were found to have included liquor (Home Office, 2001), with liquor being a segment in up to 70% of all stabbings and beatings, 40% of aggressive behavior at home occurrences and half of youngster insurance cases (Alcohol Concern, 2000). These figures are exceptionally upsetting and the author’s believability is seriously harmed in denying faith in such figures. The writer parts of the bargains a non-serious inquiry by posing to whether we would need â€Å"to live in a free nation where individuals live as their hearts advise them† or whether we need to attempt and â€Å"control the conduct of the poor by estimating them out of exercises that we dislike of?†  A comparable utilization of talk can be seen all through the article. For instance, the creator proposes that the following stage after least unit valuing might be an expansion in theater passes to lessen the quantity of â€Å"poorer, less instructed individuals who may talk during the show.† This is a case of metaphor where the creator is misrepresenting so as to control their crowd and make a forceful passionate response. Using talk, the creator will would like to urge their crowd to ‘come round’ in their mind. Be that as it may, the article would be unmistakably progressively convincing if the writer were to utilize more realities and observational proof to help their perspectives. All in all, the article is elegantly composed as far as convincingness and in utilizing talk to make a forceful passionate response in the crowd. In any case, the creator time and again offers expressions that negate current exact proof without avocation, which harms the validity of the source.  References Liquor Concern (2000) Britain’s Ruin: Meeting Government Objectives through a National Alcohol Strategy. London, UK: Alcohol Concern. Anderson, P., Chisholm, D. also, Fuhr, D.C. (2009) Effectiveness and cost-viability of approaches and projects to decrease the damage brought about by liquor. Lancet, 373, pp. 2234-2246. Senior, R.W., Lawrence, B., Ferguson, A., Naimi, T.S., Brewer, R.D., Chattopadhyay, S.K., Toomey, T.L. also, Fielding, J.E. (2010) The viability of assessment approach mediations for diminishing exorbitant liquor utilization and related damages. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 38(2), pp. 217-229. Home Office (2012) The Government’s Alcohol Strategy. London, UK: Home Office. Home Office (2001) Fighting Violent Crime Together: An Action Plan. London, UK: Home Office. Kuntsche, E., Rehm, J. also, Gmel, G. (2004) Characteristics of gorge consumers in Europe. Sociology and Medicine, 59, pp. 113-127. McKee, M. (2012) Minimum unit estimating for liquor †the case for activity is overpowering. European Journal of Public Health, 22(4), pp. 451. NHS (2011) Statistics on Alcohol: England, 2011. London, UK: The NHS Information Center. Purshouse, R.C., Meier, P.S., Brennan, A., Taylor, K.B. also, Rafia, R. (2010) Estimated impact of liquor evaluating approaches on wellbeing and wellbeing financial results in England: an epidemiological model. Lancet, 375, pp. 1355-1364. Rehm, J., Mathers, C., Popova, S., Thavorncharoensap, M., Teerawattananon, Y. also, Patra, J. (2009) Global weight of ailment and injury and financial cost inferable from liquor use and liquor use issue. Lancet, 373, pp.

Research Proposal (E-waste Dumping & The Rule of Law in the 'Computer Paper

Proposition (E-squander Dumping and The Rule of Law in the 'PC Village' Lagos - Nigeria. Synergizing Enforcement Process - Research Paper Example It isn't to no end that individuals remain in one mainland and make acquisition of merchandise from different landmasses without expressly meeting the vender. Once more, it isn't in vain that somebody sits in the solace of his home in Lagos and watch live soccer matches from the Stanford Bridge in London. Every one of these procedures are made conceivable by the rotating intensity of innovation. Innovation may in this way be for the most part viewed as something to be thankful for and the development of it thereof (Koduah, 2003). In any case, it becomes stressing when innovation and so far as that is concerned, globalization won't develop through the correct methodology. It is essential to welcome the way that any wonder; including globalization and mechanical headway might be viewed as acceptable however in the event that it is executed through a poor methodology, the genuine embodiment of the marvel gets vanquished. 1.2 Statement of the Problem According to the World Bank and Inter national Monetary Fund, the ongoing financial emergency will â€Å"widen worldwide imbalance and dive a greater amount of the African populace into poverty† (Trevor, 2009). ... This circumstance is descried as electronic waste dumping (Cal Recycle, 2005). E-squander is by and large contended to be an out of line way that the Western world is attempting to overcome any issues in innovative progression that exists in Nigeria. Because of this, there have been calls and worries from International, local and nearby institutional natural laws that ensure open right to ongoing wellbeing for basic examination into the issue of e-squander dumping in Lagos. 1.3 Research Aims 1. To clarify from a hypothetical point of view what electronic waste dumping implies. 2. To basically survey how rule of law in Lagos advances or restricts electronic waste dumping in Lagos. 3. To distinguish explicit authorization forms in International, provincial and nearby institutional natural laws that ensure open right to constant wellbeing that are being manhandled because of electronic waste dumping in Lagos. 4. To give the main drivers of electronic waste dumping in Lagos and by augmen tation, Africa. 5. To gauge what the inevitable impacts of electronic waste dumping would be for Africa and Lagos to be explicit if the training is made to proceed. 1.4 Research Questions 1. What is the history behind electronic waste dumping in Lagos? 2. What variables have advanced the ceaseless presence of electronic waste dumping in Lagos? 3. What is the situation of rule of law in restricting or advancing the electronic waste dumping cycle in Lagos? 4. By what means can global, local and nearby organizations be instrumental in tending to the issue of electronic waste dumping in Lagos? 5. Does the ceaseless act of electronic waste dumping have any drawn out antagonistic impact on Africa? 1.5 Justification of the Research Problem The effective

Love in the Passions - Literature Essay Samples

There exists a debate between Rousseau, Plato and the philosophers of the Encyclopedia over the experience of the passions. While Plato and the philosophers choose to philosophically debate over the reasons behind love and sexuality, Rousseau, who insists that imagination wreaks so much havoc, unfastens philosophy from the passions and argues that they are independent ideas that need not be interconnected. One could delve in to this dispute from two sides; one being that love is a difficult concept whos reasons need high levels of inquiry to achieve understanding, or that the passions are straightforward and do not need an in-depth exploration. These two opposing sides are not only battling for and against segregation of thought and reason, they are also at odds on the definition of love itself. In Rousseaus The Basic Political Writings, he claims that the more violent the passions are, the more necessary the laws are to contain them. Noting that the passions are violent already off ers them a negative overtone, which is only enhanced by Rousseaus insistence that even if [the laws] were capable of repressing [the passions], the least one should expect of them would be that they call a halt to an evil that would not exist without them. (Rousseau, p. 56) It seems that Rousseau fears going further with the idea of love; one which supposedly brings about the existence of evil by being active. So what exactly does he believe repressed love is, and why does love need to be held back at all? Rousseau writes about love like it is an animal of sorts that should not be allowed to run wild; perhaps he sees it as an unnatural distraction, reserved for nearly savage beings. Besides the fact that it seems that Rousseau believes that the passions should be separate from activities of thought or internal investigation, it appears that he also views the exaggeration of love as an interference with the natural order of things. Rousseau brings in an example of the Caribs, an anc ient people who of all existing peoples, are the people that wandered least from the state of natureleast subject to jealousy, even though they lived in a hot climate which always seems to occasion greater activity in these passions. (Rousseau, p. 56) Therefore, from this statement, it is possible to sense that Rousseau views the emotion of jealousy as straying from the state of nature. The Caribs are acting righteously, according to Rousseaus opinion, because of their removal from temptation i.e. love, etc. (especially considering the climate conditions). According to this evidence it can be said that Rousseau sees jealousy as an abstract idea (whereas love should not be), and as being a reaction to succumbing to the passions. In addition, by stating that although enticement was present for the Caribs, and that they were able to suppress their vulgar emotions, so to all man has the ability to resist desire. Rousseau seems to operate in a different way than he admits. It seems that all of his justifications as to why love is an unnecessary evil and should not be left for the imagination, actually counteract their initial purpose. Philosophy is the attribution of a set of beliefs towards ideas; it is in some sense a way of thinking and an attitude one possesses towards life. It seems that Rousseau tries to separate the passions from philosophy but rather ends up connecting the two by offering insights. One other possible idea involving Rousseau is that his objection may not stem from the idea of love at all, but rather violence; he views violence as unpleasant. However, he associates the two in that they coexist as one. What would become of men, victimized by this unrestrained and brutal rage, without modesty and self-control, fighting everyday over the object of their passion at the price of their blood? (Rousseau, p. 62) It seems that he has pre-constructed an image of what love is; a battlefield. Because of his accepted definition he explores from this ang le alone and sees no reason to leave his sphere of personal understanding. Having undergone much gender debate over the years has raised various important questions on the roles of men and women. However, there has always been agreement in one area; one sex cannot exist without the other. The passions motivate uncommon actions and helps arouse new emotions and ideas. Yet if these bonds are a necessity to the human race then why are we so disconnected from its true meaning? There has yet to be a one universal explanation of love and there has yet to be one who understands its powers fully. As in Platos Symposium, when the enlightenment influenced the exploration of thoughts, even to the wisest of men love was still a concept that was bewildering. Rousseau understood love as an opinion, whereas Plato and the philosophers understood it as a question. Platos Symposium serves as a text that depicts some of the guidelines of love as seen by the philosophers of Platos time. One of these p hilosophers, Diotima, speaks of her interpretation of love and its effects on those swayed by it. She connects physical attraction (physical love) to the creation of new ideas (intellectual love). By interweaving these two forms, she actually proves that if one exists it reawakens the other. The result is that our lover will gaze at the beauty of activities and laws and to see that all this is akin to itself, with the result that he will think that the beauty of bodies is a thing of no importance. Thus, the initial physical attraction ultimately leads to an enlightening state; opposing Rousseaus notion of detachment. Furthering her elucidation, Diotima adds that gazing upon this, he gives birth to many gloriously beautiful ideas and theories, in unstinting love of wisdom, until, having grown and been strengthened there, he catches sight of such knowledge, and it is the knowledge of such beauty. (Plato, p. 58) The speech of Pausanias sheds light on another matter. Pausanias insists t hat, the plain condemnation of Love reveals lust for power in the rulers and cowardice in the ruled, while indiscriminate approval testifies to general dullness and stupidity. (Plato, p.15) By this observation Pausanias implies that love has the ability to weaken those defeated and those who succumb to it in its entirety. In some way this statement insists that it is impossible to be correct by neither the approval nor disapproval of love. So what is left if not these two options? It would seem that Pausanias insists not on choosing a side, but rather on that love should be interrogated.If Symposium is a drunken discussion with various ideas protruding from all sides, what makes the idea of a chaotic dialogue on the passions more comprehensible than Rousseaus opinion that they should be aimed at disjointedly? I believe it to be that no one is very sure of how to identify the passions, and there is no need to. It is a subject that should be open to many individual impressions. One wh o experiences love does not experience the same love as his neighbor; you have to take into consideration the idea of personal experience intruding on every separate personality. Therefore, regarding the passions, they not only should be combined with philosophy, rather it is necessary they do so for the sake of defending the passions for what they are; nothing in particular or open to interpretation.

Post Traumatic Stress Disorder ( Ptsd ) - 1513 Words

America has participated in many wars since her birth as a nation. She has been known as a war machine, and the country thrives economically during these periods. The aftermath of war has affected each individual differently. Post-traumatic stress disorder is nothing new, yet it is now finally known as a condition that may not be treatable, however some has developed ways of managing it. Veterans from the Vietnam and Iraq/Afghanistan conflicts are in the spotlight now for suffering with this condition. Are the Vietnam Veterans offered the same care as the recent combat Veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan, and does the timing of when PTSD interventions take place determine the outcome of the soldier? The conflict in Vietnam was a different war†¦show more content†¦To understand each individual soldier’s PTSD diagnosis, we must examine the war theater they were in. For the Vietnam veteran the public support they encountered was that of violent negativism. The combat front line consisted of little sleep, ragging gun fights that went on for hours or days, and facing the challenge of the racial war between the ranks. They did not have the modern convinces of calling home, e-mailing, or skyping home on a daily basis. Their mindset was shut off from the world of home they left behind, and focused on the war they found themselves in. Also, many lives were lost during Vietnam, and some soldiers did not go out of their way to say hello to a new soldier that was replacing one that died since they to would probably be gone in a day or so (West, 2014). When those that survived the combat battles of war finally came home the only PTSD help they received was that through family, friends, and other soldiers. This could be since the American Psychiatric Association (APA) released a second edition of their manual Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Disorders (DSM-II) that eliminated PTSD as a diagnosis. However, in the first released edition it was considered a diagno sis, however it would be cured in 6 months’ time, or a different diagnosis would be needed (Friedman, 2015). For the current combat Veteran, the experience of war was a vast difference. For

Evaluation Of A Public Health Campaign - 1658 Words

Laney Larsen Evaluation of a Public Health Campaign: The Campaign to End Obesity Evaluation of a Public Health Campaign: The Campaign to End Obesity The Campaign to End Obesity is a national public health campaign whose overall motto is â€Å"to advance America’s journey to healthy weight.† It is known in this current age that two-thirds of America’s adults and one-third of the youth population are overweight or obese. Even more shocking is the fact that over $200 billion has been spent on medical costs attributed to obesity. Obesity will be the main contributor for why this generation of youth will live shorter lives than their parents if we keep going at the rate we are now. This public health campaign was established in†¦show more content†¦Another area is the campaign’s push for more effective widespread medical treatment. All of these changes are in part of changing public health policy. The campaign gives statistics and informs to influence policy makers to change current public policy on the prevalent and national disease of obesity. The sponsors of this campaign are the leaders involv ed with the medical and political sides of the obesity epidemic including public health providers, medical providers, and academia. They work together in this campaign to provide information on all sides of medical care, public policy, and overall health conditions and well being. The primary audience of this public health campaign is the entire population of America because obesity is defined as an epidemic and an epidemic can be defined as a widespread disease affecting vast amounts of people in a large area. We, as Americans, have the highest rate of obesity in the world, and yet we have the highest expenditures on health care in the world. The campaign is directed towards Americans of all ages, however, there is an emphasis on the rising rate of obesity among youth. A greater focus is targeted towards younger and upcoming generations, since the direction of future obesity rates is dependent on them and the changes they will make. Through use of the media, the

Ashley Treatment Paper free essay sample

The Ashley treatment also involves removing the growth factors such as the removal of breath buds and uterus and these are against the natural laws. As doctors, we should do anything possible to benefit the patient and not cause even more pain to a child who is already suffering. This argument is related to the natural law theory where the doctor thinks the Ashley treatment is preventing nature to take its course. It also relates to the non-maleficence principle because the doctor thinks we should not add any more pain to the patient. This is a short term vs. ong term situation because by conducting theses surgery under the Ashley treatment, the patient will no longer be able to repossesses puberty, breast buds and height. I oppose with this doctor’s viewpoint because the purpose of removing uterus and breast buds is for the convenience of the patient. Pillow angels only has the intelligence of infants so it’s already impossible for them to take care of themselves for t he most basic actions such as eating and sitting, let alone adding menstrual cycle and puberty pain. The surgery under the Ashley treatment only induces a little pain on the patient with pain control nd this would benefit the patient for a long time after the surgery. The estrogen therapy to inhibit the growth of the patient will make it easier for the caregivers to take care of the patient and this is very important because the decision of having the Ashley patient also affects the caregivers significantly. My viewpoint is related to the utilitarianism theory in that I think having the treatment provides the greatest good. It also relates to the beneficence principle, which is to do everything that is best for the patient. The concept related to this argument is short term vs. long term because having the surgery is a one-time thing, but it can benefit both the patient and the family for a really long time. Doctor 2: The Ashley treatment is a violation of the civil rights of individuals, and it should be prohibited. Parents have rationalized that this is an OK thing to do, but it treats people as though they have no worth. This will be a slippery slope that could end with the idea that people with disabilities dont have to be kept alive or integrated in society. This viewpoint associates with deontological theory because the doctor thinks it is not right to treat people by limiting their growth. In addition, this viewpoint is also related to the justice principle because it emphasizes that people with disability should have equal rights as normal people do and that the Ashley treatment is a violation of the human civil rights. The concept related to this viewpoint of justice vs. mercy, the doctor’s viewpoint is supporting justice because he thinks all human have equal rights. I oppose with this viewpoint because the Ashley treatment’s intent is to improve patient quality’s life, not to take away the civil right of an individual. The parents only chose to undergo the Ashley treatment because they believe it is going to improve the patient’s quality of life. Moreover, the reason that the parent chose to undergo the estrogen therapy was because it will be better to care for the patient at home and also because the parents think no one else would provide better care for their own child, which is reasonable. The disability people have has a wide range of severity from not being able to walk to a pillow angel. The Ashley treatment is not violating human rights for the fact that the doctors remove breast buds and uterus from a patient; this action only helps the patient from experiencing more pain. Moreover, pillow angels are impossible to survive on their own so they should not be considering the same as other people with disability. People who are not able to walk can still move themselves around with a wheelchair but a pillow angel would die if no one takes cares of her, that’s why it’s important to also consider the ability and convenience of the caretakers. This viewpoint associates with Utilitarianism because it looks at the consequence that patient that undergo the Ashley treatment is eventually better off. This also relates to the beneficence principle because I think the treatment is going to benefit the patient. Doctor 3: In Ashley’s case, the parents are making all the decision without the patient’s consent. To let a child undergo those surgeries is very cruel and against the natural law. The surgery doesn’t help improve Ashley’s quality of life but the parent’s quality of life. As doctors, we should make medical decisions based on what’s best for the patient. In this case, what’s best for the patient is to let her grow up naturally and experience what a normal human being would experience. The parents are merely choosing the Ashley treatment because it’s more convenient for them to take care of the patient. This argument is associated with the natural law theory because the doctor things that it’s best to let the patient grow up naturally. In addition, it’s also related to the respect for autonomy principle because he states that parents are making the decision without the patient’s acknowledgement. Lastly, it’s associated with the justice vs. mercy concept where the doctor supports justice because he thinks the patients deserves to grow up normally like all the other human beings. I disagree with this argument because first of all, it’s impossible for the patient to make any decision or contribute her thoughts given that she’s a pillow angel with the IQ of an infant. She will never get any more intelligent as she grows up and that’s why her parents need to make the decision for her. Of course her parents would want her to grow up naturally but given the situation she’s in today, growing up to a adult size would make taking care of her a really big problem. The patient will only be better off if her parents are able to take good care of her and the only way to achieve that is to let her remain in a children’s size. The doctors should do anything that would help the patient and the parents therefore getting the Ashley treatment is the right step to take. The decision of having the Ashley treatment will make the life easier for the patient and the family in the long run. This argument is following the utilitarianism theory because it is looking at the consequence of the Ashley treatment that provides the greatest good. It’s also related to the beneficence principle because it states that the doctors should do anything beneficial to the patient. Lastly, it’s related to the short term vs. long term concept because the patients and family’s life will be better off in the long run.