Post Traumatic Stress Disorder ( Ptsd ) - 1513 Words

America has participated in many wars since her birth as a nation. She has been known as a war machine, and the country thrives economically during these periods. The aftermath of war has affected each individual differently. Post-traumatic stress disorder is nothing new, yet it is now finally known as a condition that may not be treatable, however some has developed ways of managing it. Veterans from the Vietnam and Iraq/Afghanistan conflicts are in the spotlight now for suffering with this condition. Are the Vietnam Veterans offered the same care as the recent combat Veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan, and does the timing of when PTSD interventions take place determine the outcome of the soldier? The conflict in Vietnam was a different war†¦show more content†¦To understand each individual soldier’s PTSD diagnosis, we must examine the war theater they were in. For the Vietnam veteran the public support they encountered was that of violent negativism. The combat front line consisted of little sleep, ragging gun fights that went on for hours or days, and facing the challenge of the racial war between the ranks. They did not have the modern convinces of calling home, e-mailing, or skyping home on a daily basis. Their mindset was shut off from the world of home they left behind, and focused on the war they found themselves in. Also, many lives were lost during Vietnam, and some soldiers did not go out of their way to say hello to a new soldier that was replacing one that died since they to would probably be gone in a day or so (West, 2014). When those that survived the combat battles of war finally came home the only PTSD help they received was that through family, friends, and other soldiers. This could be since the American Psychiatric Association (APA) released a second edition of their manual Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Disorders (DSM-II) that eliminated PTSD as a diagnosis. However, in the first released edition it was considered a diagno sis, however it would be cured in 6 months’ time, or a different diagnosis would be needed (Friedman, 2015). For the current combat Veteran, the experience of war was a vast difference. For

Evaluation Of A Public Health Campaign - 1658 Words

Laney Larsen Evaluation of a Public Health Campaign: The Campaign to End Obesity Evaluation of a Public Health Campaign: The Campaign to End Obesity The Campaign to End Obesity is a national public health campaign whose overall motto is â€Å"to advance America’s journey to healthy weight.† It is known in this current age that two-thirds of America’s adults and one-third of the youth population are overweight or obese. Even more shocking is the fact that over $200 billion has been spent on medical costs attributed to obesity. Obesity will be the main contributor for why this generation of youth will live shorter lives than their parents if we keep going at the rate we are now. This public health campaign was established in†¦show more content†¦Another area is the campaign’s push for more effective widespread medical treatment. All of these changes are in part of changing public health policy. The campaign gives statistics and informs to influence policy makers to change current public policy on the prevalent and national disease of obesity. The sponsors of this campaign are the leaders involv ed with the medical and political sides of the obesity epidemic including public health providers, medical providers, and academia. They work together in this campaign to provide information on all sides of medical care, public policy, and overall health conditions and well being. The primary audience of this public health campaign is the entire population of America because obesity is defined as an epidemic and an epidemic can be defined as a widespread disease affecting vast amounts of people in a large area. We, as Americans, have the highest rate of obesity in the world, and yet we have the highest expenditures on health care in the world. The campaign is directed towards Americans of all ages, however, there is an emphasis on the rising rate of obesity among youth. A greater focus is targeted towards younger and upcoming generations, since the direction of future obesity rates is dependent on them and the changes they will make. Through use of the media, the

Ashley Treatment Paper free essay sample

The Ashley treatment also involves removing the growth factors such as the removal of breath buds and uterus and these are against the natural laws. As doctors, we should do anything possible to benefit the patient and not cause even more pain to a child who is already suffering. This argument is related to the natural law theory where the doctor thinks the Ashley treatment is preventing nature to take its course. It also relates to the non-maleficence principle because the doctor thinks we should not add any more pain to the patient. This is a short term vs. ong term situation because by conducting theses surgery under the Ashley treatment, the patient will no longer be able to repossesses puberty, breast buds and height. I oppose with this doctor’s viewpoint because the purpose of removing uterus and breast buds is for the convenience of the patient. Pillow angels only has the intelligence of infants so it’s already impossible for them to take care of themselves for t he most basic actions such as eating and sitting, let alone adding menstrual cycle and puberty pain. The surgery under the Ashley treatment only induces a little pain on the patient with pain control nd this would benefit the patient for a long time after the surgery. The estrogen therapy to inhibit the growth of the patient will make it easier for the caregivers to take care of the patient and this is very important because the decision of having the Ashley patient also affects the caregivers significantly. My viewpoint is related to the utilitarianism theory in that I think having the treatment provides the greatest good. It also relates to the beneficence principle, which is to do everything that is best for the patient. The concept related to this argument is short term vs. long term because having the surgery is a one-time thing, but it can benefit both the patient and the family for a really long time. Doctor 2: The Ashley treatment is a violation of the civil rights of individuals, and it should be prohibited. Parents have rationalized that this is an OK thing to do, but it treats people as though they have no worth. This will be a slippery slope that could end with the idea that people with disabilities dont have to be kept alive or integrated in society. This viewpoint associates with deontological theory because the doctor thinks it is not right to treat people by limiting their growth. In addition, this viewpoint is also related to the justice principle because it emphasizes that people with disability should have equal rights as normal people do and that the Ashley treatment is a violation of the human civil rights. The concept related to this viewpoint of justice vs. mercy, the doctor’s viewpoint is supporting justice because he thinks all human have equal rights. I oppose with this viewpoint because the Ashley treatment’s intent is to improve patient quality’s life, not to take away the civil right of an individual. The parents only chose to undergo the Ashley treatment because they believe it is going to improve the patient’s quality of life. Moreover, the reason that the parent chose to undergo the estrogen therapy was because it will be better to care for the patient at home and also because the parents think no one else would provide better care for their own child, which is reasonable. The disability people have has a wide range of severity from not being able to walk to a pillow angel. The Ashley treatment is not violating human rights for the fact that the doctors remove breast buds and uterus from a patient; this action only helps the patient from experiencing more pain. Moreover, pillow angels are impossible to survive on their own so they should not be considering the same as other people with disability. People who are not able to walk can still move themselves around with a wheelchair but a pillow angel would die if no one takes cares of her, that’s why it’s important to also consider the ability and convenience of the caretakers. This viewpoint associates with Utilitarianism because it looks at the consequence that patient that undergo the Ashley treatment is eventually better off. This also relates to the beneficence principle because I think the treatment is going to benefit the patient. Doctor 3: In Ashley’s case, the parents are making all the decision without the patient’s consent. To let a child undergo those surgeries is very cruel and against the natural law. The surgery doesn’t help improve Ashley’s quality of life but the parent’s quality of life. As doctors, we should make medical decisions based on what’s best for the patient. In this case, what’s best for the patient is to let her grow up naturally and experience what a normal human being would experience. The parents are merely choosing the Ashley treatment because it’s more convenient for them to take care of the patient. This argument is associated with the natural law theory because the doctor things that it’s best to let the patient grow up naturally. In addition, it’s also related to the respect for autonomy principle because he states that parents are making the decision without the patient’s acknowledgement. Lastly, it’s associated with the justice vs. mercy concept where the doctor supports justice because he thinks the patients deserves to grow up normally like all the other human beings. I disagree with this argument because first of all, it’s impossible for the patient to make any decision or contribute her thoughts given that she’s a pillow angel with the IQ of an infant. She will never get any more intelligent as she grows up and that’s why her parents need to make the decision for her. Of course her parents would want her to grow up naturally but given the situation she’s in today, growing up to a adult size would make taking care of her a really big problem. The patient will only be better off if her parents are able to take good care of her and the only way to achieve that is to let her remain in a children’s size. The doctors should do anything that would help the patient and the parents therefore getting the Ashley treatment is the right step to take. The decision of having the Ashley treatment will make the life easier for the patient and the family in the long run. This argument is following the utilitarianism theory because it is looking at the consequence of the Ashley treatment that provides the greatest good. It’s also related to the beneficence principle because it states that the doctors should do anything beneficial to the patient. Lastly, it’s related to the short term vs. long term concept because the patients and family’s life will be better off in the long run.